April 27, 2011 1:07 AM PDT
Thanks guys for your input. I still think Harley had a better engine in the EVO due to the fact it had gear drive cams instead of the cam tensioners on the Twinn Cam. To which I had to replace at 29000 miles. My type of riding, is mostly touring, no hotdogging... Gear drive would make the engine more bullet proof. Don't ya think?
April 27, 2011 11:54 PM PDT
Not sure about that Coley, Rex is a Twin Cam with 62,000 now and except for a shorted stator has been trouble free.
April 28, 2011 10:21 AM PDT
I too suffered from a stator fry! But mine was caused by something far more sinsiter than a short! My clutch hub had been deteriorating for sometime that I was at the time unaware of... when I fried out my stator I thought "Man how tyical, middle of Sturgis and it's 99 degrees!" Well upon further diagnosis I discovered that a piece of the clutch hub had made its way through the oil bath and around the rotar right into my stator! That's when I discovered that my 2007 models have a one year only stator, so I have to upgrade that soon!:(
Also, the new twin cams no longer have chain tensioners, they are all hydraulic now! 4 ft/lbs of tq to the chains vs. 45 ft/lbs of tq! YIPPEE!:-)
April 28, 2011 11:56 AM PDT
Am I mistaken or did I read somewhere (AIM I think) that the hydraulic system can be retrofitted to the older twin cams?